Press "Enter" to skip to content

Unite the Right lawsuit still on track for 2020 trial

A wide-ranging lawsuit stemming from the Unite the Right rally is still on schedule for an October trial, according to comments made by counsel during a Monday telephone hearing.

Sines v. Kessler has slowly worked its way through U.S. District Court since it was filed in October 2017, less than two months after the deadly rally. The lawsuit targets key organizers and participants of the white supremacist rally and was filed on behalf of a number of Charlottesville-area residents by Integrity First For America.

Throughout the case so far, unfulfilled discovery requirements have plagued plaintiffs’ counsel as they attempt to get documents, devices and social media credentials from various defendants.

A steady stream of motions to compel have filled the lengthy case’s docket, but late last year a three-week trial date was set for October. As the concerns over the spread of COVID-19 — a disease caused by the novel coronavirus — grow, it appeared unclear what impact this would have on that trial date.

However, according to plaintiffs’ counsel, the parties have been able to smoothly transition to digital communications and expect to resume depositions via video conference soon.

Monday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe checked in with various parties, clarifying whether they wished to hold hearings to argue various motions the court has not yet ruled on.

Among those filings are motions to compel documents, devices and online credentials from James Alex Fields Jr., as well as Jeff Schoep, who formerly led the National Socialist Movement and several to compel documents the National Socialist Movement and Robert “Azzmador” Ray, alleging the defendants also have ignored their requirements.

Fields, who is currently serving multiple life sentences for a car attack following the rally that killed Heather Heyer injured dozens of others, is also accused of destroying evidence.

David Campbell, Fields’ court-appointed civil attorney, maintained an argument Monday that his client had submitted everything that was within his power to submit. Some of the requested documents are not eligible for discovery because they are part of his criminal proceedings.

Roberta Kaplan, an attorney for the plaintiffs, also brought up an outstanding motion to enjoin defendant Christopher Cantwell for allegedly making threats against her and other counsel. Cantwell is currently being held in New Hampshire jail after being indicted on federal charges related to extortion and interstate threats.

Because Cantwell has been indicted for similar accusations of threats, Kaplan said she hoped the Western District U.S. Court would soon issue a ruling on whether to enjoin him.

Both plaintiffs’ counsel and defense counsel agreed that the motions could be resolved by written order from the court and that no further hearings were necessary. Hoppe did not give a timetable for when the court would issue rulings.


Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: